The Darkness Revisited

1971 is the defining moment of our life as a nation. We came together as a people, and we won for ourselves freedom and independence, the chance to set the course of our own destinies, and we won it against heavy odds.

The men and women who won for us our freedom are peerless. No matter where the rest of their lives took them, their actions in 1971 would ensure that successive generation of later Bangladeshis would look up to them as heros, as larger-than-life icons, as reminders of what we could achieve when we allowed the best that is in us to emerge.

But beside the light, there is darkness. 

For the the nine months between March and December 1971, our people were laid bare before a frenzied force of animals, whipped up by propaganda on their side to to regard us as fair game in the war. In these nine months, while we won for ourselves our freedom, aided by allies from India and around the world, we paid a terrible, sickening, generation-damaging price for it.

I still can not help but wonder, as I look back at those nine months, was there a failure of military and political leadership? Could someone have anticipated and planned better? Could the terrible toll that was extracted from our people in life and dignity been reduced, or avoided?

Could our leadership have pursued a course that did not entail our people caught bare and helpless in front of an army?

But then, maybe I am being too harsh. Maybe it is easier to sit here and now, thirty-six years later, safe in the knowledge that we won in 1971, and question the wisdom of those who won us our freedom. Because after all, if theirs had been such an avoidable mistake, surely we would have avoided it a second time around? Surely we would not allow the situation to arise once more where force is again the final arbitrator of justice in our country? Surely we would have spent time and labour developing institutions that would prevent precisely this scenario?

Surely we would have made sure that our people are never again left defenseless against any army, anyone who would try to overpower them? That even in an infinitely smaller scale, the same terror would not afflict them again? 

In a way, I prefer writing about the political news nowadays. It gives the illusion that these are still some rules, some norms of decency that our society is still adhering to. It distracts me from the over-hanging darkness that is now present all around us in Bangladesh, that would swallow any of us if we looked too closely.

Witness the plights of Jahangir Alam Akash, a reporter from Rajshahi, whose crime was to have reported human right violations RAB, Bangladesh’s para-military security force. He reported about a man whom RAB officials had shot and left to die in front of his wife and daughter. He apparently, foolishly, still believed in the freedom of press under this military government, still believed that the concept of human rights had any validity in our country today. Thus he now lies in jail, both of his legs shattered through torture, facing a host of false cases, fighting a system and a force which seek to deny him any of the rights we usually take for granted.

Dr. Mahbubul Islam

Witness Dr. Mahbubul Islam, a professor at St. Francis Univeristy in Pennsylvania. He moved back to Bangladesh to give back to his beloved country, both in term of his learning, and his resources, which he invested in Bangladesh’s economy. Today he sits in a cast, beaten by the goons of Geeteara Safiya Chowdhury, who, ironically enough, is the civilian head of Bangladesh’s Social Welfare Ministry under the current military junta. It’s probably safe to say that beating up people and terrorizing them is not a formal part of her job description.  

Khandokar Delwar Hossain

 Witness Khandokar Delwar Hossain, an old man, slapped and threatened by soldiers, now on a hospital bed. His crime, to still work for democracy, and refuse to obey the orders of the military government. As a seasoned politician, and one of our elected represantatives, he deserves civility from our administration, no matter who is currently in power. Instead, the military government sees fit to send soldiers to his home, to assault him verbally and physically, and to arrest his son. That is all the fate that awaits all who dare resist the military junta, who dare to throw any spanners in their plans.

These are just snapshots of what must be happening all across our country today. I urge you to write to our government, to tell them torture and denial of free speech is not an acceptable mode of governance. I urge you to visit the blog of Nazim Farhan Chowdhury, Ms. Safiya Chowdhury’s son and start a dialogue with him regarding the newspaper reports detailing his parents’ activities.

And I urge you to ensure we do not make the same mistake again.

13 Responses to “The Darkness Revisited”

  1. Nazim Farhan Choudhury Says:

    Ofcourse any dialouge on the allegations against us will most welcome. It is through discussions and not jumping to conclusion that progress can be made.

    We as a nation have become very intolerant and ready to play the blame game. Without even wanting to know the truth, we are ready to condemn someone who has built over the last 35+ years a service oriented business with impeccable reputation.

  2. sotacit Says:

    Please feel free to discuss any pertinent details that you feel would shed light on this incident.

  3. Shameed Farhad Says:

    “We as a nation have become very intolerant and ready to play the blame game. Without even wanting to know the truth, we are ready to condemn someone who has built over the last 35+ years a service oriented business with impeccable reputation.”

    The name of the commenter clearly identifies him with Nazim Kamran and GeetiAra family.

    Well, does the above mentioned statement apply to thousands of better/equally reputed businessmen, politician or their families who are locked up in jail for months without any specific charges or ridiculous charges?

    Or isn’t it the premises this Government is here for and Mrs GeetiAra and four of her relatives are flag car driving ministers?

  4. ai Says:

    Dear NFC,
    I agree, dialogue is the way. Could you please give us the facts from your side? Without facts, dialogue is futile. So far we haven’t seen any explanation from your side or from the CTG. And dispute should be resolved through the legal system, not by might! Apparently that’s what happened. Could you point out what we are missing here?

  5. Nazim Farhan Choudhury Says:

    Basic facts are that this is (was) a simple lease dispute. We rented the said premise for initially 5 years which was to be automatically renewed for 5 further years. As such we invested money in the completing the building. In February of this year the two parties entered into a verbal understanding that the new contract will be drawn up soon. However we were given notice to vacate. Given that it is close to impossible to find and move 50,000 sq ft in a short time we requested adequate time be given for us to do so. We have gone to court seeking enforcement of our tenancy agreement and / or compensation incase we have to move. This matter is pending in the courts.

    To our surprise on the 5th of October just before the Eid holidays (and may I add the busiest time of the year for us) the landlord violating the court directives cut of our electricity. After the court holiday, we went back asking for reinstatement. At this time the landlord started delaying tactics asking for more time. As you will quite understand it is impossible to run an office without electricity. We are incurring a revenue loss of Tk 20 lakhs a day due to this. And hence we made provisions to put in our own generators.

    While trying to bring in our generators the landlord resisted and brought in some “goons” to prevent us from doing so. There was some verbal altercation at that time which was witnessed by 150+ people (crowd) who had turned up at the place. After we brought in the generator the landlord made an impromptu speech to the gathered crowd. Very interestingly he spent rest of the afternoon all over the place talking to people and police. However three days later he called a press conference where he turned up in leg cast and made unsubstantiated allegations against us, including the libelous one that we had threatened his wife and him with bodily harm.

    One has to go to the root of the issue here. Why doesn’t the Islam pair want us a tenants? Amongst the many things they are claiming is that we are using an electricity load more than they allocated and that we have made changes to the structure of the building. Neither of these two points were brought to our notice during the 5 years prior. (we did have some issues with load distribution in the building which was resolved in 2003 with assistance of all tenants.)

    What they fail to mention that they have put claims to (and have illegally occupied) an empty plot of land adjacent to the building. And that they came to Mrs Choudhury requesting her to use her influence to influence Rajuk to allocate the plot in their name. Which ofcourse Mrs Choudhury refused. We believe that this is the reason why there is this level of animosity against us.

    Another reason we believe is that they have requested us time and time again to doctor the rental agreement and payment so that there has to be lower tax incidence on them. We have refused to budge from the NBR’s directives.

    Right now there are cases pending in the courts. We will go by the verdicts of these courts.

  6. sotacit Says:

    Thanks for responding. I have a question, though. It seems that the basic point of contention is the renewal of lease. In that case, wouldn’t it have been prudent, since the landlord had not renewed the lease, to have made preparations to move if he wanted you out? I mean, it seems to me that the onus is on the tenant, not the landlord.

  7. Nazim Farhan Choudhury Says:

    You are absolutely right. It would be. Except for the fact that the lease was to be renewed for another 5 years. We were reassured in February of this year that it will be and again in June.

    We have invested money in completing the building thinking that it we would spread the investment over a 10 year period and hence will be financial at a loss if we are asked to move before a 10 year period.

    We are now asking for enough time to be given for us to find adequate facility (we need about 45-50,000 sq ft in Gulshan-Banani area) and financial compensation (to reimburse us for our investment in the building) if we are asked to move.

    Realistically speaking finding an office block of this size is not easy. The Islams will themselves tell you that it took us 8 months from the time we saw their building to the time we moved in. And not to mention another 7 months of search that we conducted. To multiply our worries, with this issue being sensationalised, many would be space owners are backing down! :(

  8. adit Says:

    I am actually quite surprised at some of the reactions to this blog. Mr. (I presume!!) Shameed Farhad talks about Mrs. Choudhury and her relatives driving around in flag cars. Yes! It is her and their prerogative to do this. Having given up what she was doing (and very successfully, at that) to help out a nation in crisis is extremely commendable. What ISN’T commendable are people like Mr Farhad who hide behind their computer screens and criticise everything that is going on. What, may I ask, is his contribution to making this a better country?
    As far as the case in question is concerned, both Mr. & Mrs. Islam are complete and utter liars. I shudder to think what he has taught his students all these years – apart from what is written in the textbooks (which anyone can read and learn by rote), it is also the responsibility of teachers to instil ethics in their students. How is this possible when they themselves have NONE?
    Mrs. Islam has lied repeatedly to the tenants of the building, the police, the courts and now to the people of the country with this press conference.
    As far as beating up people goes, that is not something that happened. Neither was Mr. Islam beaten up (and his leg allegedly broken) by Mr. Kamran Choudhury, nor was his wife slapped while “pleading for her husband’s life”. In all probability, Mr. Islam was probably beaten up by his wife for being such a ninny!!!!
    As Farhan Choudhury has mentioned, they are trying to take possession of the plot of land behind their existing building (ILLEGALY) and have already built tin structures there to house their goons.
    Isn’t it wonderful how people look for things like this and then pass judgement? As far as the original article is concerned, I would have thought that the writer would’ve bothered to find out the facts before writing. But I guess that would have meant that no one would read the blog!!!
    And, as far as Mr. Farhad is concerned, perhaps should get off his rear end and do something worthwhile instead of spending his time on the computer and writing nonsense.

  9. ai Says:

    Dear Adit,
    Now we know, the story of two sides doesn’t match. It doesn’t automatically make your side true and other side false. So we don’t see anything that says you or Islams are liars. The other possibility is both parties are lying to some extent. Anyway It is very difficult to prove any verbal agreement in a court. I presume, Chowdhuries are smarter than that!

    What puzzles me is the black out of the news by the media. I did not see any letter disputing the account of Islams by Chowdhuries.

    Your last paragraph also make me wonder - if you are so righteous, why you are so irritated that people are writing about it. Shouldn’t you be happy that you get a chance to explain your side of story, when every news outlet is not carrying it?

    You are blaming people without any proof of your claim. Mr Farhad is doing his part of making the country better by asking question (if it is a democracy, not autocracy). What made our country disfunctional is the resistance from persons in power to answer those. I can see you are not different!

  10. Shameed Farhad Says:

    Adit

    “Yes! It is her and their prerogative to do this. ”

    Who gave them this prerogative? An election? An elected parliament? Isn’t it is their membership of the Chowdhury dynasty and relationship to a civil crony of a military government?

    You then got carried away with a liteny of allegations against Dr Islam. These are ugly character assassinations. If an “Adit” can do this much to Dr and Mrs. Islam in a remote blog, we certainly can imagine what Mr Kamran can do to Dr/Mrs Islam when his business ambition faces an obstacle. To be frank, Adit, your ugly statements about Dr Islam kind of proves that what Dr Islam said in that press conference was true.

    Adit, in case you don’t know, exposing the hypocrisy of your clan is a major achievemnt of internet writings. And, no thanks, whatever red eye you come up with, this kind of non-sense writing will continue, as long as the ugly interior is not totally uncovered.

  11. Protik Pronab Says:

    NFC, I am kind of baffled how the tenancy deal got to the point where your parents found themselves dealing with a disgraceful event in public! Ms. Choudhury is an advisor and Mr. Chudhury is an established business person. How could not they foresee the consequences of what was goign on? If She could not, how She could advise the government on the welfare matter of the entire nation and its people; if He could not how He could tackle such a large business! Was/is there something else that you would like to share with us?

  12. 1971 Says:

    Is Adit the indian son-in-law of Nazim Kamran/Geetee Ara Choudhury?

  13. sotacit Says:

    That is correct.

Leave a Reply